Similar WorldsReviews 94

The mods of the site dont mod the place. They allow what ever, only telling you if you have a problem with a user to just block them and dont take care of harassment, which the site has a lot of.
This site is creepersville. A lot of probably sex offenders who reside online to get away because they cant do this crap offline. The site has a lot of catfish which the admins dont get rid of, they actually protect those people as well as the countless pedophiles that are on the site. The admins should be looked at by the fbi for housing and protecting such people.
The admins have turned the Q and A site into a sex site, allowing nudity and perversion. Its not for your everyday person to join. A lot of smut and sick fetishes. A lot of diaper wearers, people who poop and pee themselves, a lot of married people looking to fool around and harass other users. A lot of creepy old men looking on to hit on young girls and men pretending to be girls. Also a lot of women who seem to just want to play other men. All the connections you make on there is pointless. Most people on there are narcissists. A lot of cliques that harass other people especially if a person has a problem with one user, the group gets together and attacks the user even having smear campaigns against people. The admins dont do anything against bad behaviors. This site shouldnt exist.

Trolls, underage kids, tons of fake accounts, pervs, pedos, narcissists, scammers, feminazis, racists, people who act like teenagers in their 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s, depressed people who want to kill themselves... you approach this site with a positive attitude, leave feeling angry, offended and disturbed. Spend a month on it, you will become bitter and unfriendly towards others online and offline as well. If this sounds like something you fancy, join today

A year ago I was so pleased with this site. I had a problem being harassed and Nuno dealt with it so effectively.
Now this place seems to be crawling with jealous and petty people whose aim seems to be to pick on the users deemed to be popular, and proceed to harass them. And inspite of there being moderators, there seems to be not much moderating going on because these people seem to get away with just a light tap on the back of their hand in the name of ToS breach.
It is no wonder, its going down so fast and it is getting hard to find much of quality any more.
A shame, when a contributing and active member is treated this way.

I was on another site that used to have an issues with trolls, That is, disputers and those wished to spread lies and falsehoods. And I read most of the comments below, I realize those trolls have found a home here. So many untruths have been told as fact. The character assignation that two two owners of the site have gone through in these comment is seldom seen.

I went to the site the week it opened and I am still there. I have watched it grow -and evolve- and I do not believe it is done. Will they give the users everything they want? No. A site cannot please all. But the majority will be happy.

As for the owners I know very little of them. And that is fine, I need not know their business. Personal or private. And neither should any business they have be anyone else's concern.

I suspect the negative comment. Below, is a coordinated effert on the part of one, or a group--o demean similarworlds.

Long time users of the site can see right through the BS.

The reviews here are horrible and are NOT true. I can't believe anyone would post these kinds of reviews yes the site is still in development but the site hasn't even been open for a year yet. These people make out the admins to be idiotic morons which they are NOT they are amazing men that care about the community!

The owners of the site are secretive about their identity.

They post user PayPal details on their Twitter account.

Nuno Peralta has a following of "unknowns" on Twitter.

Andrew Davis has no profile to speak of.

These people have access to sensitive information - their motives for releasing an unfinished site are?

Other social network owner details are readily available on the public domain - why not these people?

Being able to delete abusive posts to cover tracks - is this a good idea?

Hiding friends and activity - the only reason people want to hide things if they are doing something wrong?

It seems now that making your activity and your "friend list" visible is a thing of the past and it is seen as "why are they showing their activity" as a strange thing?

If you want to experience bullying join similar worlds the site admins don't care and have joined in on some occasions as they are biased due to the fact they have normal accounts and hide their friend list because they are friends with the site bullies.

https://mobile.twitter.com/similarworlds_

Note the posting of user details - was permission asked. The blurring of details is not professional my software was able to reveal full names.

https://mobile.twitter.com/nunomperalta

The followers are spam accounts - if this Nuno character is as tech savvy as he makes out why would he jeopardise his reputation by allowing a spam following on Twitter?

There is nothing available on Andrew Davis. He owns iOrbix.

In the terms of service they state "we share your information with trusted sources" in their opinion they are trusted BUT what about your end user? Who are these other trusted sources? It could be anyone!

Also when requested to delete an account they are unwilling? It takes up to 10 emails before they answer a query!

I am highly concerned about the privacy policy and the way in which a concern was dealt with by the site admins and the owner turning a blind eye to my issue.

I asked them how they share the information and who they are and they refused and ignored my question. I was being harassed by another user that is 'cosy' with the site admins. Therefore the user deemed themself as above being disciplined for online bullying.

Here is the carefully constructed privacy policy:

Do we disclose any information to outside parties?

We do not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer to outside parties your personally identifiable information. **This does not include trusted third parties who assist us in operating our website, conducting our business, or servicing you, so long as those parties agree to keep this information confidential.**We may also release your information when we believe release is appropriate to comply with the law, enforce our site policies, or protect ours or others rights, property, or safety. However, non-personally identifiable visitor information may be provided to other parties for marketing, advertising, or **other uses**

** what are the other uses I ask the site owner. They refused to answer.

**i approached the site owner and asked how my personal information is used by third parties and who they were and by what means do we have an assurity that they are trusted - the site owner again refused to comment.

Admins are generally rude to those that have constructive criticism about the site.

Overall if the site owner refuses to answer questions about how they use user date this is a huge red flag and would warn people against entering their information.

The site is anonymous therefore this is a great tool for the online predator since the age range is 13+ and the posts are rather explicit it is not a positive atmosphere overall as bullying is rife.