Check out our latest communities fighting
AI scams on Reddit and Facebook
On SmartCustomer, businesses may not offer incentives or pay to remove reviews. Learn more about our Review Guidelines.
WebSleuths has a rating of 1.7 stars from 106 reviews, indicating that most customers are generally dissatisfied with their purchases. Reviewers dissatisfied with WebSleuths most frequently mention law enforcement, long time and new members. WebSleuths ranks 362nd among Forum sites.
We monitor reviews for authenticity
They bully people and heavily censor the conversation. The moderators are a joke (don't expect a response if you need help). There are plenty of better sites out there.
I have been a member of Websleuths for over a year. I find most of the other members to be caring, intelligent people who write interesting commentary on cases. They frequently bring relevant life and job experience to bear on the discussions. For example, members come from all sorts of occupations that can be relevant to a case under discussion: attorneys, teachers, nurses, psychologists, social workers, members of law enforcement, etc.
I don't understand why so many of the reviews on this site are negative, but it looks like many of the people commenting here violated Websleuths' terms of service. The TOS stipulate a variety of rules that keep the site informative and civil: information must come from a mainstream media source; victim-shaming is not tolerated; family members of victims or suspects are not to be sleuthed; etc. I comment quite often and I've never had a "time out."
If you are interested in Websleuths, check it out. With over 150,000 Websleuth members, the reviews on this site are not representative of most members. Judge for yourself.
This site claims to be one where cases and evidence can be discussed in an environment free form cursing and harassment, but what it really is, a place where intelligence is shunned, and if people don't dummy-down, they are removed-literally for no reason. There are little posts that are applied to the banning or "time-outs" but they seem more like a technicality than a legitimate reason for removing persons. At one time Websleuths had excellent research and posters were quite brilliant, but it's almost as if the owner of this website wants to keep the intelligence level down to lower triple digit IQs or less. Maybe these become the most loyal followers. I've messaged with people who are afraid of saying the wrong thing, who are thoughtful and well informed. Why should anyone participate on a blog where one would have to be afraid of saying what is on one's mind ins a respectful manner. And that is the point here. I would understand if people were banned because they were trolling and rude, but very nice people get banned. It's almost Orwellian. Bad site. And you can never really leave. It's not like Reddit where you can erase comments and identity-they want those kept, even if you are no longer there. You gotta wonder why, and what the actual agenda is here.
II joined eagerly thinking this is kind of forum I could learn law from and how investigations are actually done. I was wrong. Most of those I've come across do not go by any law standards and feel free to through half truths into a mix of lies. People arrested are already guilty even before the arraignment. Modern-day old-school witch hunt. They question the ability for LE to do their jobs by trying to fit triangles into a circular hole and not understanding why things they feel are not adding up. Certain pet rocks get the treatment of the free range to where they can say any nasty old thing they want about both victims and the accused and then when called on it parade a miss america speech of thank you's to the towns LE and all those that hold office then go in for the dig on the person. Unimpressed with Moderators and Grown adults viciously attacking others insofar as placing words into other's mouths when the other person simple doesn't feel they are making sense in what they are saying. Not my place. I'd rather make some friends who KNOW LE like the back of their hands. Sticking to the rules of LAW is justice for the victims. Not bashing their parents or grandparents. NOT a VICTIM FRIENDLY SITE
Constantly saw relevant posts removed. It is extremely apparent that they do not like the truth. They act like the Rhoden family were angels even though they were criminals as well. If you refer the Rhoden family's criminal past you will receive an automatic ban even though they found evidence of $#*! fighting and marijuana grow operations on their properties. Their (Rhodens) social media posts are full of hate filled prejudice comments and images and if you mention it on WS you will get attacked removed or banned. The WM3(west memphis 3) thread is more of the same. If you state an opinion not mirroring that of the mods of those that have donated to Tricia Griffiths bogus GFM you will be give a ban. I would stay away from this site at all costs. Seems like a bunch of simple minded old hags that stay up all night posting the same rambling bs.
There's no sleuthing at all on WS. Once MSM posts news, it can be discussed.
The mods allow members to make false allegations against innocent people, make fun of handicapped persons & ridicule physical appearance of suspects & their family/friends.
Threads are repetitious with sophomoric remarks. Certain members compete for the most "likes" for their posts. There is a lot of humor, members think LE read WS & use their posts to solve crimes. I suspect if we could see the members, it'd be similar to an Aerosmith video. You know... the fat lady with curlers in her hair?
The same members are online pretty much 24/7. Once they've "solved" the case they are currently sleuthing, they will "report" anyone with the audacity to differ in opinion.
Wonder how many lawsuits are pending against WS?
If you want a laugh on a boring day, this is the place to go. If you truly have interest in a case, stay away.
Join, watch, listen. If you choose to comment, then expect the ego's to reply with dribble and ridiculousness, it's a competition to attempt badly to come up with better ideas than the police, to justify their presumably sorry lives. Ok for a giggle and it will certainly make you appreciate yourself, but, then delete...
Those handful old timers are outrageously intolerant of any new member disagreeing with their theories. If you have more brain cells than them, you are an enemy and will soon find yourself unwelcome, complained about, and eventually banned (it doesn't take long). They keep it their own littler paradise.
Long time member but I got peeved when a moderator slammed another member for something and the moderator was incorrect. When I corrected the mod, I was "shushed" and my posts deleted.
The mod was 100% incorrect and links were provided to prove it. But they don't like not looking good. They shut people up, and doing so in this situation could put lives at risk. This place is not what it once was. Avoid it. They put lives at risk in favor of not wanting their mods to look bad when they mess up.
It's seriously a rule. You can't call the mods out for being wrong. Wtf is that?
If you want to be timed out for having an opinion that differs from the mods or the favorite posters opinions, if you want to be bombarded by the owner TRICIA GRIFFITH begging for donations, if you want to have your PM's read by the mods, then this is the place for you. And that doesn't even cover the fact that most of these threads are ruined by Tricia and her minions inability to stick to simple rules. The rules that are implemented are ridiculous and do not allow you to be a websleuth-er, which is ironic given their name. And that is if you can follow the rules, considering Tricia and her mods change the rules depending on the thread, and the poster.
There are favorite posters who basically post what they wish, I assume they are giving Tricia money, usually how it works there. And then there are posters who get banned for simply having an opinion.
And now Tricia, and her little pet, Levi, want members to leave 5 star reviews and donate money to a podcast that they have not even made an episode of yet. So hilarious.
Here's a suggestion that would make the site 100% better, TRICIA, sell up to someone with a brain and good morals, and you run along and get a job. Then you won't have to keep asking the people you plan to ban or the people you $#*! about in your secret mod threads for money.
(I haven't even been banned yet, I didn't get that far before walking away)
This true crime forum is amazing. Sign up, post about the crimes that fascinate you, crimes that you want to see solved, reveal what you see and know, follow the rules though because they don't allow any crap. Love it.
Most ill informed bunch of people ever. Owner is a joke. Gatekeepers everywhere. Again average IQ about 38. Actually think LE uses them.
Tricia Griffith asks for contributions from members to run the website via gofundme. The numbers she quotes for server fees and operations are VERY inflated, in fact, Websleuths generates an income through ad sales.
DO NOT FALL FOR TRICIA'S SCAMS
I have seen The bullying for years on this site. What credible Crime site is constantly begging for contributions from it's members claiming gloom and doom on a regular basis? There are links to gofundme even in the crime threads. Members beware.
I got attacked, bullied, and put in time out for not saying nice things about Mollie Tibbets' murderer. They allowed the bullying, and they are searching for reasons to absolve a murderer. It's sickening. Websleuths jumped the shark.
Everything posted by others true. Websleuths run by nazi controlling wanna be crime silvers. Bans common except for favorites. No first amendment here. Dont bother registering. The worst.
These people are lunatics who whip up fear of others - blacks especially, but also other POC, gays, liberals, drug users, anyone who isnt basically Anita Bryant - and tell filthy lies about victims, their family members, and suspects.
Every family member of a murder victim has had one of these despicable evil ghouls sniffing around them. They are a pack of monsters.
I registered with this website to follow a local missing-persons case and was blocked with the following message:
You are on a Time Out for the following reason:
"Is there any constructive reason for continuing this barely relevant thread?" After making this comment it is apparent you are not going to work out at Websleuths. I would try Topix.
Date the Time Out will be lifted: Never
Given the outrageous assumptions that were being aired on this site, I find their response to my comment unbelievable.
I was a member for several years and, while it's a good way to keep informed on cases you see in the news, there are too many members whose sole purpose is to cut other people down. There are threads on the website where decorum is maintained and you feel comforted knowing there are people who truly care about victims, want to see justice through, and want to help unravel clues that will lead to justice. Some members really are able to contribute knowledge and skills to the forums because of their backgrounds. Other members are there not to add anything productive or intelligent--just to have something condescending to say to or about other members. As another reviewer said, some of the threads are about taking sides and certain members are hateful toward other members who state a point-of-view that differs from their own. I tried to make new members feel welcome and delicately defend them (trying not to offend either side), but got cut down as well. While some people on the forums are quick to accuse someone in a case (even family members of a victim) of a crime, others adamantly defend a suspect with overwhelming evidence against him/her who is named as a suspect by law enforcement, even to the point of vilifying the victim, law enforcement and the legal system, and persist in their opinion after the suspect has been found guilty in a court of law. Although such members are usually in the minority, they lash out at everyone else discussing the case. The forums are moderated, but moderators are inconsistent in dealing with bullies--they are sometimes hateful themselves and show favoritism. Some threads become very long not because of a lot of movement or analysis in the case, but because some people do not read the thread before posting, even a page or two back or if it's a short thread, and others post comment after comment without saying anything productive. Sometimes it appears to be a contest to see who can end up with the most posts. I think some members believe they will get to become a moderator and influence the direction of the website if they reach a certain number of posts. I would not recommend the website to people who are sensitive (the people most likely to care about crime victims). If you don't already suffer from depression you probably will after joining WebSleuths, not only from reading about the terrible crimes people commit but also from your treatment by other members.
I went to the site to find information on a certain cold case. What I found was one member destroying not only the victims but the surviving family members. It's a horrible way to treat victims.
Answer: Depends, if it's something they agree with you'll be golden, if you have any level of criticism then they are harsh.
Answer: At one time Websleuths actually did provide a space for good investigatory endeavours. If you look at archives from 2006 era of the site, there was some great research done. But in the last five or six years all the intellect has been banned and you are left with primarily very very old people, who do no research, barely know the facts of the cases they are discussing, and who babble and are annoyed by anyone who interrupts their babble with facts.
Answer: It's legitimate in that is is a chat-room blog, it is illegitimate in that what transpires on this blog is the farthest thing from "sleuthing" or crime solving that I can think of. Most people on the site are unfamiliar with detailed facts of the cases, or with forensics. There are regulars who roam from forum to forum in zombie-like fashion, espousing the exact same thoughts over and over again, regardless of the case or topic. There is also a lot of claim to expertise or relevant profession that is supposedly vetted by Websleuths, claims that seem doubtful. If someone says they are an attorney, that alone does not make them qualified to speak to just any legal issue. And any attorney not afraid of a law suit would make this full disclosure upfront. Yet none of the so-called attorneys on the site do this. And if someone presents themselves as an expert or practicing professional, why aren't others on the forum allowed to know what actual qualifications they have and who they are. It's one thing to remain anonymous when you are simply giving an opinion-but when you claim your opinion is based on experience or education, I do believe at that point you should be prepared to reveal yourself, so that people can know the quality of the information they are relying on. Websleuths is a real chatroom blog, but it is a sham as a place of fact and substantiation.
Answer: Find another forum. Websleuths is really not worth the time.
Answer: I don't know. I suspect they are just not very intelligent people and resent those who are.
Answer: Don't worry. I guarantee you'll get more insight on Reddit than web-nonsleuths. They have nothing to offer.
Answer: Because assholes need to try to feel clever so they join to self flatter. It's the same reason none do any decent research because the unspoken rule is to not make others look dumb. If you do they attack in groups and use corrupt moderators to shut you down.
Answer: Don't waste your time. Reddit has much cleverer commentary on cases. Websleuths is very low IQ and geriatric.
Gain trust and grow your business with customer reviews.
Claim your free account
Gain trust and grow your business with customer reviews.
Claim your free account