DoublelistReviews 12,584

I have seen prostitutes drug dealers guns and dogs on this website. Yet I still come back. When Covid started I thought everyone was being stupid. I made an ad that said so and got banned. I apologized and said I was understress and it wouldn't happen again. Nope. No review no response nothing. It's been 4 years. You can still find whores, drugs, guns, people $#*!ing dogs and kiddie porn here but you won't find real genuine people cos they ban them.

Straight guys, waste of time. Gay guys, go for it.
I go daily to the woman for men category, Every day the same aging posts. Once every 3 days, if that, a new poor quality unattractive woman posts.
If your gay, you will strike it rich for guys for guys, but that's not me.
The 10's of 1000's of good reviews must be fake or from Gay men, guys for guys.
I paid and it still SUCKS
Almost no active woman on page 1 of "women for men". It's the same posts everyday with a trickle of new posts at the top. 1000's of men for less than 10 active women, if that...honest.
Other Factors
---no dates when last on-line or when posted. You could spend hours messaging inactive people. No dates clearly for this reason.
---No..."on line now"
---can't search profile names and I paid to subscribe
---search bar subject very limited. A joke...no results for that search
---no emails on got a message. Got it once and then stopped when I had a few messages fro the same person.
---no red badge at the top stating messages.
BRUTAL WASTE OF TIME FOR STRAIGHT MEN

While my experiences on the platform haven't been flawless, it's evident that there are ongoing efforts to enhance communication features. In my view, the introduction of categories/tags would significantly improve user navigation, enabling a quicker and more direct search experience. This feature not only streamlines the process but also facilitates users in discovering like-minded individuals through shared interests in posts or bios.

Another suggestion for improvement involves implementing a ratings or score% system for users. By assigning scores based on specific criteria, such as meet-up reliability and safety, users can make more informed decisions about potential interactions. For instance, a low rating in "meet-ups" would serve as a red flag, prompting users to exercise caution. Additionally, a low safety rating would serve as a general indicator to avoid certain individuals. These enhancements not only contribute to user safety but also make the platform more user-friendly, fostering a sense of trust among its community.

I appreciate the recent addition of private messaging, which has been a long-awaited and valuable feature. However, the in-person meeting experiences have been somewhat inconsistent for me. By incorporating these suggested improvements, I believe the website could become more user-centric and offer a more seamless browsing experience.