Check out our latest communities fighting
AI scams on Reddit and Facebook

business logo of Acta Scientific

Acta Scientific

4.5

On SmartCustomer, businesses may not offer incentives or pay to remove reviews. Learn more about our Review Guidelines.

How would you rate Acta Scientific?
grey stargrey stargrey stargrey stargrey star

Acta Scientific Reviews Summary

Acta Scientific has a rating of 4.5 stars from 26 reviews, indicating that most customers are generally satisfied with their purchases. Reviewers satisfied with Acta Scientific most frequently mention editorial board, dental sciences and impact factor. Acta Scientific ranks 44th among Science News sites.

service
3
value
3
shipping
3
returns
3
quality
3

We monitor reviews for authenticity

India
1 review
0 helpful votes
Follow Abderrahmen B.
Unfollow Abderrahmen B.
Share Review
Report Review

I had previous relationships with several journals as reviewer and author. By reviewing my previous experiences with other journals in comparison with Acta scientific medical science (ASMS), I tried to summarize the positive points of this journal and the weaker points that I would like them to evolve and improve.
Since joining the ASMS editorial team, as well as reviewer, author and editorial board member, I have noticed a high level of professionalism especially regarding response times, quality and variety of publications.
Also I have to mention the quality of reviewing manuscripts through a well-organized grid.
This editorial work is the result of a committed and experienced team that I am proud to be among them.
In the wish to see our team grow to ensure maximum publication.
In the perspective of reading in 2020 more and more low-cost publications see for free to a category of scientific researchers who do not have enough means, I suggest to the pharmaceutical companies of sponsored this newspaper without links of interest

Date of experience: February 12, 2020
India
2 reviews
1 helpful vote
Follow Shiva K.
Unfollow Shiva K.
Share Review
Report Review

Every article is reviewed by the editorial board before publishing thanks to Acta Scientific for great work.

Date of experience: February 3, 2020
Brazil
1 review
3 helpful votes
Follow Victor L.
Unfollow Victor L.
Share Review
Report Review

I have been contributing to ASMI since they published my first work (5 May 2019 issue). The magazine has proved welcoming and respectful of authors. The peer-reviewing process appears to be legitimate.

The Journal shows its presence on the Web of Science and Publons. They regularly publish proper research and have even invited me to contribute as an Editorial Board Member. They respect Authors copyright issues. Also, they have always been open to feedback, and I have not found the journal in blacklist showing untoward publishers.

The only reason why I do not give it a full 5-star rating is that it is a starting journal (Volume 3 Issue 1 Corresponds to January 1, and the Impact Factor = 0.8272) and lacks some features of more advanced journals. There is much room for improvements, but it seems they are up to it.

Date of experience: December 31, 2019
India
1 review
4 helpful votes
Follow Nikolas E.
Unfollow Nikolas E.
Share Review
Report Review

It was on 8th of August 2019, when I received a very informative, kind and honorable email from Ms Sushmita Sahoo, Managing Editor of AS Gastrointestinal Disorder, inviting me to join AS Gastrointestinal Disorder Journal as Editorial Board member of the journal and to submit an Article to the journal.
This initial e-mail attracted my interest because of the immediacy, simplicity and sincerity. It was really a very honorable proposal and an opportunity to publish some of my work. Also, I could immediately visit the Acta Scientific Journal website, through attached web addresses, so I had all the information I needed to decide to join the journal immediately, without waste of time.
I was also surprised about the high quality of the Journal home page and how easy and quick was to submit an article online. I had never had such quick experience to publish my work, which I could find in some days online.
Finally, It is worthy to mention the respect, enthousiasm, patience, kindness, modesty and courtesy of Ms Sushmita Sahoo, Managing Editor of AS Gastrointestinal Disorder and the originality without plagiarism, in her emails to me, that forced me to work more and sent some more articles for publication. I have to agree that my experience was so positive that I would definitely recommend the journal to my colleagues.
I would like to thank all of the editors and of course Ms Sushmita Sahoo, for this great work and I hope I will continue to collaborate with AS Gastrointestinal Disorder Journal.
Kind Regards
Nikolas E, MD
Gastroenterologist
Greece

Date of experience: November 25, 2019