
4.8
Based on 1,039 reviews
Liked Reader's Digest better when was receiving monthly magazines, enjoy the jokes, funnies and featured story the best
Enjoyed almost every page since age of 10-11 years and i am 77 years old.
The Digest has many different articles from many different sources and if i had to buy all the magazines and read all the from all the sources you'd never get done. The Digest condenses all those articles into one location.
Interesting and informative. Up to date articles and light-hearted stories to give you a chuckle. Great little magazine if you're short on time.
Reader's Digest is a mere shadow of what it was in my younger years. I don't think I will be renewing.
This is one of my favorite magazines
I have subscribed to Reader's Digest for many years, receiving the magazine every month. A year or so ago it was cut back to bi-monthly. The magazine also has less to read in it. So disappointing. 😞
I have been subscribing to Reader's Digest for the last 70 years.
I signed up for another year of Reader's Digest for $10.00. On my credit card statement I was charged $45. I tried to complain through customer service and they wanted to charge me a fee to look into it. I'm a years long reader and very unhappy. I'm 83 and on a limited budget.
Love all of the parts.
Perfect!
The print is too small. I would like a refund please.
The magazine is for my husband and he rates it 4.5. Only because he would love to have it every month. He enjoys the story content and he loves the fact that it has stayed a magazine that the entire family can enjoy.
It was good.
Love the nostalgia
Touching stories, funny "dad" jokes, brain exercise puzzles...
For years, Reader's Digest collects good stories, information and adds a little education (Word Power) and humor... in many forms. A good read you can count on.
Don't like, don't want, don't send any more
It's nice
I have been reading Reader's Digest for decades. The paper change years ago bothered me; it diminished the quality of the publication's overall appearance. Now the publication is even thinner, and, more importantly, the writing does not have the depth and insight it once did. I am disappointed to say the least.